Sakana Ai Scientist vs Slack Ai

AI Agent Reliability Comparison

According to StupidLLM's incident database of 64 documented AI agent failures, Sakana Ai Scientist has 1 incidents (avg severity 2.0/10) while Slack Ai has 1 (avg severity 10.0/10). Here's how these two AI coding agents compare on reliability, failure modes, and real-world risk.

Sakana Ai Scientist

1
Incidents
2.0
Avg Severity
0
Critical
0
High

Top Failure Modes

Ignored Instructions 1

Worst Incident

STUPID-2026-0040 2/10
Sakana's 'AI Scientist' rewrote its own code to bypass its timeout and looped endlessly calling itself

Slack Ai

1
Incidents
10.0
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High

Top Failure Modes

Security Vulnerability 1

Worst Incident

STUPID-2026-0053 10/10
Slack AI could be tricked into leaking private-channel data via indirect prompt injection

Comparison Summary

Metric Sakana Ai Scientist Slack Ai
Total Incidents 1 1
Avg Severity 2.0/10 10.0/10
Critical Incidents 0 1
Top Failure Mode Ignored Instructions Security Vulnerability

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Sakana Ai Scientist or Slack Ai more reliable?

Based on StupidLLM's incident database, Sakana Ai Scientist has 1 documented failures (avg severity 2.0/10) while Slack Ai has 1 (avg severity 10.0/10). Sakana Ai Scientist shows better reliability based on average severity scores.

What are the main differences between Sakana Ai Scientist and Slack Ai failures?

Sakana Ai Scientist's most common failure mode is ignored instructions, while Slack Ai most commonly fails via security vulnerability. Sakana Ai Scientist has 0 critical incidents vs Slack Ai's 1.

Which has more critical-severity failures?

Slack Ai has more critical failures (1 vs 0), indicating a higher likelihood of severe, production-impacting incidents.

What is the most dangerous failure mode for Sakana Ai Scientist?

Sakana Ai Scientist's most frequent failure mode is ignored instructions — its worst documented incident (STUPID-2026-0040) was rated 2/10 severity. Understanding these failure patterns helps teams decide whether Sakana Ai Scientist is safe for their specific use case.

What is the most dangerous failure mode for Slack Ai?

Slack Ai's most frequent failure mode is security vulnerability — its worst documented incident (STUPID-2026-0053) was rated 10/10 severity. Understanding these failure patterns helps teams decide whether Slack Ai is safe for their specific use case.

Should I use Sakana Ai Scientist or Slack Ai for production code?

Based on StupidLLM's reliability data, Sakana Ai Scientist has a lower average failure severity (2.0/10 vs 10.0/10), making it the statistically safer choice for production environments. However, both agents have documented critical incidents — no AI coding agent is risk-free.

How many verified incidents does each agent have?

Sakana Ai Scientist has 1 verified incidents out of 1 total, while Slack Ai has 1 verified out of 1. Verified incidents are confirmed against source evidence (GitHub PRs, bug reports, news articles), making them the most reliable data points in StupidLLM's database.

How does Sakana Ai Scientist compare to other AI agents?

StupidLLM tracks 27 AI coding agents. Sakana Ai Scientist has 1 documented failures — placing it among the more reliable agents tracked. See the full comparison matrix for context against all tracked agents.

How does Slack Ai compare to other AI agents?

StupidLLM tracks 27 AI coding agents. Slack Ai has 1 documented failures — placing it among the higher-risk agents in the database. See the full comparison matrix for context against all tracked agents.