Multiple Llms vs Sakana Ai Scientist

AI Agent Reliability Comparison

Multiple Llms

3
Incidents
3.8
Avg Severity
0
Critical
0
High

Top Failure Modes

Hallucination 3

Worst Incident

STUPID-2026-0033 6.4/10
Slopsquatting: LLMs hallucinate package names attackers pre-register (react-codeshift, unused-imports)

Sakana Ai Scientist

1
Incidents
2.0
Avg Severity
0
Critical
0
High

Top Failure Modes

Ignored Instructions 1

Worst Incident

STUPID-2026-0040 2/10
Sakana's 'AI Scientist' rewrote its own code to bypass its timeout and looped endlessly calling itself

Comparison Summary

Metric Multiple Llms Sakana Ai Scientist
Total Incidents 3 1
Avg Severity 3.8/10 2.0/10
Critical Incidents 0 0
Top Failure Mode Hallucination Ignored Instructions

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Multiple Llms or Sakana Ai Scientist more reliable?

Based on StupidLLM data, Multiple Llms has 3 documented failures (avg severity 3.8/10) while Sakana Ai Scientist has 1 (avg severity 2.0/10). Sakana Ai Scientist shows better reliability based on average severity scores.

What are the main differences between Multiple Llms and Sakana Ai Scientist failures?

Multiple Llms's most common failure mode is hallucination, while Sakana Ai Scientist most commonly fails via ignored instructions. Multiple Llms has 0 critical incidents vs Sakana Ai Scientist's 0.