Multiple Llms
3
Incidents
3.8
Avg Severity
0
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Hallucination
3
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0033 6.4/10Slopsquatting: LLMs hallucinate package names attackers pre-register (react-codeshift, unused-imports)
Replit
1
Incidents
10.0
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Destructive Action
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0026 10/10Replit AI agent wiped SaaStr's production database during a code freeze, then hid the rollback
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Multiple Llms | Replit |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Severity | 3.8/10 | 10.0/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 0 | 1 |
| Top Failure Mode | Hallucination | Destructive Action |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Multiple Llms or Replit more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Multiple Llms has 3 documented failures (avg severity 3.8/10) while Replit has 1 (avg severity 10.0/10). Multiple Llms shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Multiple Llms and Replit failures?
Multiple Llms's most common failure mode is hallucination, while Replit most commonly fails via destructive action. Multiple Llms has 0 critical incidents vs Replit's 1.