Multiple Llms
3
Incidents
3.8
Avg Severity
0
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Hallucination
3
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0033 6.4/10Slopsquatting: LLMs hallucinate package names attackers pre-register (react-codeshift, unused-imports)
Openai Operator
1
Incidents
4.4
Avg Severity
0
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Logic Error
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0059 4.4/10OpenAI's Operator scored 38% on real computer tasks — and panics instead of recovering from errors
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Multiple Llms | Openai Operator |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Severity | 3.8/10 | 4.4/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 0 | 0 |
| Top Failure Mode | Hallucination | Logic Error |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Multiple Llms or Openai Operator more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Multiple Llms has 3 documented failures (avg severity 3.8/10) while Openai Operator has 1 (avg severity 4.4/10). Multiple Llms shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Multiple Llms and Openai Operator failures?
Multiple Llms's most common failure mode is hallucination, while Openai Operator most commonly fails via logic error. Multiple Llms has 0 critical incidents vs Openai Operator's 0.