Multiple Agents
5
Incidents
4.8
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Other
2
Infinite Loop
1
Logic Error
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0032 10/10Scan of 5,600 vibe-coded apps found 2,000+ high-impact vulns, 400+ exposed secrets, PII leaks
Openai Operator
1
Incidents
4.4
Avg Severity
0
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Logic Error
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0059 4.4/10OpenAI's Operator scored 38% on real computer tasks — and panics instead of recovering from errors
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Multiple Agents | Openai Operator |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 5 | 1 |
| Avg Severity | 4.8/10 | 4.4/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 1 | 0 |
| Top Failure Mode | Other | Logic Error |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Multiple Agents or Openai Operator more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Multiple Agents has 5 documented failures (avg severity 4.8/10) while Openai Operator has 1 (avg severity 4.4/10). Openai Operator shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Multiple Agents and Openai Operator failures?
Multiple Agents's most common failure mode is other, while Openai Operator most commonly fails via logic error. Multiple Agents has 1 critical incidents vs Openai Operator's 0.