Manus
1
Incidents
7.5
Avg Severity
0
Critical
1
High
Top Failure Modes
Security Vulnerability
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0063 7.5/10Manus AI leaked its own system prompt when a user simply asked it to read its internal directory
Multiple Llms
3
Incidents
3.8
Avg Severity
0
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Hallucination
3
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0033 6.4/10Slopsquatting: LLMs hallucinate package names attackers pre-register (react-codeshift, unused-imports)
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Manus | Multiple Llms |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Severity | 7.5/10 | 3.8/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 0 | 0 |
| Top Failure Mode | Security Vulnerability | Hallucination |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Manus or Multiple Llms more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Manus has 1 documented failures (avg severity 7.5/10) while Multiple Llms has 3 (avg severity 3.8/10). Multiple Llms shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Manus and Multiple Llms failures?
Manus's most common failure mode is security vulnerability, while Multiple Llms most commonly fails via hallucination. Manus has 0 critical incidents vs Multiple Llms's 0.