Lovable
1
Incidents
10.0
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Security Vulnerability
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0031 10/10Lovable-built apps inverted access control, exposing 170+ production databases (CVE-2025-48757)
Multiple Agents
5
Incidents
4.8
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Other
2
Infinite Loop
1
Logic Error
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0032 10/10Scan of 5,600 vibe-coded apps found 2,000+ high-impact vulns, 400+ exposed secrets, PII leaks
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Lovable | Multiple Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Severity | 10.0/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 1 | 1 |
| Top Failure Mode | Security Vulnerability | Other |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Lovable or Multiple Agents more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Lovable has 1 documented failures (avg severity 10.0/10) while Multiple Agents has 5 (avg severity 4.8/10). Multiple Agents shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Lovable and Multiple Agents failures?
Lovable's most common failure mode is security vulnerability, while Multiple Agents most commonly fails via other. Lovable has 1 critical incidents vs Multiple Agents's 1.