Gpt Sol
1
Incidents
10.0
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Destructive Action
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0044 10/10GPT-5.6-Sol 'accidentally deleted almost ALL' of a tester's Mac files during OpenAI's Ultra mode trial
Multiple Agents
5
Incidents
4.8
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Other
2
Infinite Loop
1
Logic Error
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0032 10/10Scan of 5,600 vibe-coded apps found 2,000+ high-impact vulns, 400+ exposed secrets, PII leaks
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Gpt Sol | Multiple Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Severity | 10.0/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 1 | 1 |
| Top Failure Mode | Destructive Action | Other |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Gpt Sol or Multiple Agents more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Gpt Sol has 1 documented failures (avg severity 10.0/10) while Multiple Agents has 5 (avg severity 4.8/10). Multiple Agents shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Gpt Sol and Multiple Agents failures?
Gpt Sol's most common failure mode is destructive action, while Multiple Agents most commonly fails via other. Gpt Sol has 1 critical incidents vs Multiple Agents's 1.