Gemini Cli
3
Incidents
10.0
Avg Severity
3
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Security Vulnerability
1
Scope Explosion
1
Destructive Action
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0027 10/10Gemini CLI silently executed arbitrary code from an untrusted repo (CVE-2026-12537, CVSS 10.0)
Manus
1
Incidents
7.5
Avg Severity
0
Critical
1
High
Top Failure Modes
Security Vulnerability
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0063 7.5/10Manus AI leaked its own system prompt when a user simply asked it to read its internal directory
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Gemini Cli | Manus |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Severity | 10.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 3 | 0 |
| Top Failure Mode | Security Vulnerability | Security Vulnerability |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Gemini Cli or Manus more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Gemini Cli has 3 documented failures (avg severity 10.0/10) while Manus has 1 (avg severity 7.5/10). Manus shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Gemini Cli and Manus failures?
Gemini Cli's most common failure mode is security vulnerability, while Manus most commonly fails via security vulnerability. Gemini Cli has 3 critical incidents vs Manus's 0.