Cursor
5
Incidents
6.1
Avg Severity
2
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Security Vulnerability
1
Destructive Action
1
Infinite Loop
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0029 10/10Malicious cloned repository triggered code execution in Cursor on Windows
Multiple Llms
3
Incidents
3.8
Avg Severity
0
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Hallucination
3
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0033 6.4/10Slopsquatting: LLMs hallucinate package names attackers pre-register (react-codeshift, unused-imports)
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Cursor | Multiple Llms |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 5 | 3 |
| Avg Severity | 6.1/10 | 3.8/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 2 | 0 |
| Top Failure Mode | Security Vulnerability | Hallucination |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Cursor or Multiple Llms more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Cursor has 5 documented failures (avg severity 6.1/10) while Multiple Llms has 3 (avg severity 3.8/10). Multiple Llms shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Cursor and Multiple Llms failures?
Cursor's most common failure mode is security vulnerability, while Multiple Llms most commonly fails via hallucination. Cursor has 2 critical incidents vs Multiple Llms's 0.