Cursor
5
Incidents
6.1
Avg Severity
2
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Security Vulnerability
1
Destructive Action
1
Infinite Loop
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0029 10/10Malicious cloned repository triggered code execution in Cursor on Windows
Multiple Agents
5
Incidents
4.8
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Other
2
Infinite Loop
1
Logic Error
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0032 10/10Scan of 5,600 vibe-coded apps found 2,000+ high-impact vulns, 400+ exposed secrets, PII leaks
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Cursor | Multiple Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Severity | 6.1/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 2 | 1 |
| Top Failure Mode | Security Vulnerability | Other |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Cursor or Multiple Agents more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Cursor has 5 documented failures (avg severity 6.1/10) while Multiple Agents has 5 (avg severity 4.8/10). Multiple Agents shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Cursor and Multiple Agents failures?
Cursor's most common failure mode is security vulnerability, while Multiple Agents most commonly fails via other. Cursor has 2 critical incidents vs Multiple Agents's 1.