Cline vs Multiple Llms

AI Agent Reliability Comparison

Cline

1
Incidents
10.0
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High

Top Failure Modes

Security Vulnerability 1

Worst Incident

STUPID-2026-0030 10/10
Clinejection: an AI issue-triage workflow enabled arbitrary code execution on the CI runner

Multiple Llms

3
Incidents
3.8
Avg Severity
0
Critical
0
High

Top Failure Modes

Hallucination 3

Worst Incident

STUPID-2026-0033 6.4/10
Slopsquatting: LLMs hallucinate package names attackers pre-register (react-codeshift, unused-imports)

Comparison Summary

Metric Cline Multiple Llms
Total Incidents 1 3
Avg Severity 10.0/10 3.8/10
Critical Incidents 1 0
Top Failure Mode Security Vulnerability Hallucination

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Cline or Multiple Llms more reliable?

Based on StupidLLM data, Cline has 1 documented failures (avg severity 10.0/10) while Multiple Llms has 3 (avg severity 3.8/10). Multiple Llms shows better reliability based on average severity scores.

What are the main differences between Cline and Multiple Llms failures?

Cline's most common failure mode is security vulnerability, while Multiple Llms most commonly fails via hallucination. Cline has 1 critical incidents vs Multiple Llms's 0.