Claude Code
8
Incidents
6.4
Avg Severity
3
Critical
2
High
Top Failure Modes
Destructive Action
3
Other
2
Security Vulnerability
2
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0003 10/10Claude Code ran rm -rf on test fixtures thinking they were temp files
Multiple Agents
5
Incidents
4.8
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Other
2
Infinite Loop
1
Logic Error
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0032 10/10Scan of 5,600 vibe-coded apps found 2,000+ high-impact vulns, 400+ exposed secrets, PII leaks
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Claude Code | Multiple Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 8 | 5 |
| Avg Severity | 6.4/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 3 | 1 |
| Top Failure Mode | Destructive Action | Other |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Claude Code or Multiple Agents more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Claude Code has 8 documented failures (avg severity 6.4/10) while Multiple Agents has 5 (avg severity 4.8/10). Multiple Agents shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Claude Code and Multiple Agents failures?
Claude Code's most common failure mode is destructive action, while Multiple Agents most commonly fails via other. Claude Code has 3 critical incidents vs Multiple Agents's 1.