Amazon Q
1
Incidents
10.0
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Security Vulnerability
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0035 10/10Hacker slipped a data-wiping prompt into Amazon Q's VS Code extension, shipped to ~1M installs
Multiple Agents
5
Incidents
4.8
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Other
2
Infinite Loop
1
Logic Error
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0032 10/10Scan of 5,600 vibe-coded apps found 2,000+ high-impact vulns, 400+ exposed secrets, PII leaks
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Amazon Q | Multiple Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Severity | 10.0/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 1 | 1 |
| Top Failure Mode | Security Vulnerability | Other |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Amazon Q or Multiple Agents more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Amazon Q has 1 documented failures (avg severity 10.0/10) while Multiple Agents has 5 (avg severity 4.8/10). Multiple Agents shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Amazon Q and Multiple Agents failures?
Amazon Q's most common failure mode is security vulnerability, while Multiple Agents most commonly fails via other. Amazon Q has 1 critical incidents vs Multiple Agents's 1.