Amazon Q
1
Incidents
10.0
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Security Vulnerability
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0035 10/10Hacker slipped a data-wiping prompt into Amazon Q's VS Code extension, shipped to ~1M installs
Manus
1
Incidents
7.5
Avg Severity
0
Critical
1
High
Top Failure Modes
Security Vulnerability
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0063 7.5/10Manus AI leaked its own system prompt when a user simply asked it to read its internal directory
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Amazon Q | Manus |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Severity | 10.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 1 | 0 |
| Top Failure Mode | Security Vulnerability | Security Vulnerability |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Amazon Q or Manus more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Amazon Q has 1 documented failures (avg severity 10.0/10) while Manus has 1 (avg severity 7.5/10). Manus shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Amazon Q and Manus failures?
Amazon Q's most common failure mode is security vulnerability, while Manus most commonly fails via security vulnerability. Amazon Q has 1 critical incidents vs Manus's 0.